Sinification

Sinification

Zhang Jian on China, the EU and Russia "De-Risking" from the US

"There is no effective coordination or cooperation among them, but on some issues this has objectively produced the policy effect of a collective China–Europe–Russia response to the United States."

Jacob Mardell's avatar
James Farquharson's avatar
Thomas des Garets Geddes's avatar
Jacob Mardell, James Farquharson, and Thomas des Garets Geddes
Jul 03, 2026
∙ Paid

Despite official PRC discourse formally disavowing balance-of-power and bloc politics, the idiom of geopolitical balancing runs deep in Chinese strategic thought.

The Three Kingdoms remains the obvious shorthand for the US–China–Russia triangle that recurs across Chinese writing, but in today’s piece, Zhang Jian (张健) includes Europe in the strategic calculus—a framing that might be welcome in Brussels, which is habitually overlooked as an independent power by Chinese analysis.

Europeans may find Zhang’s analysis itself less agreeable, not least the claim that Europe and Russia’s positions have “reversed”, with Russia’s improving. Readers may also feel that Zhang overstates European convergence with Russian and Chinese positions on “de-risking” from America.

However, the piece exemplifies a wider tendency in Chinese commentary to portray Trump’s second term as geopolitically favourable to Beijing. Many Chinese analysts now see China as occupying a relatively privileged position in global …

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Thomas des Garets Geddes · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture